Newman: The question is not, were the Clinton years good in themselves? George Washington had eight good years. Why not go back to where George Washington was? You have to take into account how things develop off of what came before. The analysis, therefore, has to tie together in some appropriate way, not just the last four years or eight years, but the last 16 years. And when you analyze it that way, it’s a somewhat scary picture. And it’s not just semantics, it’s not just Was it good times or bad times? The unit to be analyzed here – the analysandum is the Latin word for it – is critical, otherwise you’re not looking at the right thing.... [From Fred Newman's and Jackie Salit's Talk/Talk]
The Hankster recommends Talk/Talk, a must read for independents and independent minded people in the US and world-wide, where every Sunday CUIP’s political director Jacqueline Salit and strategist and philosopher Fred Newman watch the political talk shows and discuss. I read it when it comes out Tuesdays on email, and usually discuss with some of my colleagues. In our partisan culture, it's a welcome nonpartisan voice on what's in the news.
No comments:
Post a Comment